|
Cleveland’s first green home was built two years
ago and we now have some idea of how it works. It is mostly good and encouraging
news, with one problem that needs to be worked on this summer. For a start,
how about a $379 heat bill for the first winter (October-March , 2001-2002)
and less than $100 more for this past very cold winter (2002-2003). And
that includes hot water for cooking and bathing because the hot water
tank also heats the house.
Good news from a green home
The GreenBuilt Homes, Ltd. Group that built this home set goals for each
phase of the building process.
What has a year of occupancy taught us? GreenBuilt Homes hoped their
house would heat for $300 the first winter (for six months). They missed
their mark by $79, but are basically pleased as are the residents who
had moved from a home that had heat bills for one month as large as the
bills for this house for the whole winter. The house was monitored during
a winter month to see how it performed temperature, humidity and CO2 wise.
A side entry hallway with a door that closed to the interior was the
primary entry used and the residents were careful to keep the interior
door shut until the outside door was closed. Temperatures remained stable
throughout the test period. The humidity also stayed stable. Carbon dioxide
which is released when we breathe and when we cook, experienced some severe
rises at several points but we were quickly able to figure out what was
happening and correct the problems.
The residents had been careful to use the range hood (which is vented
directly to the exterior) whenever cooking on their gas range. But on
one occasion they used the oven to do a roast and discovered the CO2 levels
had climbed rather high. They had forgotten that a gas range emits all
the by-products of its oven combustion into the living space which includes
lots of CO2. They have learned to turn on the fan when the oven is being
used, and this has kept the CO2 levels normal when cooking.
But the CO2 also rose when a large group of persons were visiting. A
lot of people breathing can significantly increase CO2 levels. After experimenting
with the use of one or more bath fans when many persons were visiting,
the residents discovered that turning on the second floor bath fan for
the duration of these visits kept the CO2 levels under control. A very
minimal price to pay for better indoor air quality.
Speaking of indoor air quality, a friend of the residents, a person with
severe asthma, visited for a day and found the living space the most comfortable
she had been in for some time.
The residents adopted a “shoes off at the door” policy for
themselves and those who come to visit and they feel this has helped reduce
indoor air issues as well as the GreenBuilt effort to reduce the number
of building products that could outgas and cause distress to residents
and their guests.
The one disappointing experience of the first year of occupancy was the
air conditioning cost. It turned out to be slightly higher for the six
months of April through September than the cost of heating. The air conditioning
was kept on continually, but at a reasonable temperature. We will be keeping
a close eye on this over the summer.
One theory is the heat generated by the sun entering a window high on
the front wall of the house which faces west. In Cleveland, we see very
little of the sun in the winter, but we see a lot in the summer. The late
afternoon sun enters that window and remains there for several hours significantly
warming the area adjacent to the hallway where the thermostat is located.
The residents will try to shade that window this summer to see if that
will help reduce the cooling demand. We will also be monitoring the air
handler more closely to see if any hot water is making its way into the
heating coil there. If so, it would mean the air conditioner is working
over time trying to cool. We’ll report on what we have learned.
October 2003
|